Comments for ASVGuy::SWFBlog

Comment on Online Chromatic Guitar Tuner with Flash by Burak KALAYCI

Burak KALAYCI — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:21:46 +0000

Thank you.
We have received quite a lot of positive feedback about our little tuner.
We plan to have an update, as soon as we find some time for a ‘free’ project like this. Most probably we will have ‘sensitivity’ option and also a way to select ‘target frequencies’.
Best,
Burak

Comment on Online Chromatic Guitar Tuner with Flash by Sarah

Sarah — Fri, 08 Oct 2010 04:03:26 +0000

I really like that flash guitar tuner. The online java ones are no good but the shareware downloadable ones such as AP Tuner are good. It seems like your guitar tuner is telling me every string on my guitar is lower in pitch than it should be. But I have checked against the AP Tuner and some audio generators I have and I think your tuner may be off by about 20 degrees. Will there be future versions of this same program? I’d love to see a version where you could select which note you are aiming for and then the colored circles wouldn’t disappear so quickly when the volume fades. Thanks for the only flash tuner I’ve ever seen.

Comment on Today It’s 10th Anniversary of ASV… by Robert Penner

Robert Penner — Wed, 26 May 2010 23:47:58 +0000

Congratulations Burak! Until 9 years ago I was scared of ASV, but once I started using it, I grew to love it.

Comment on I’m now on Twitter by Urami

Urami — Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:29:30 +0000

Quite an interval in your posting
Anyhow, glad you Twit and personally, I could not agree more with the Apple link. Said NO to anymore of portable devises from them.
Best regards
urami

Comment on I’m now on Twitter by Peter

Peter — Sun, 18 Apr 2010 05:03:31 +0000

Tweeter? Mass-wasting-of-time

Comment on Flash 10 and Quake in Flash by Ted

Ted — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:16:48 +0000

Quake in Flash 9. http://blog.glowinteractive.com/index.php/2010/01/quake-in-flash-9/

Comment on Prefixes vs. Namespaces… Conclusion by Burak KALAUCI

Burak KALAUCI — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:53:09 +0000

Erik posted the following to another post, I’m moving it here:
The solution you propose (if I understand it correctly): “to have the default namespace for the current version”
You can do that now if you want:
xmlns=”library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark”
Then use it like this [Button]
[ is lesser sign and ] is greater sign, editor wont allow me to type it
From a developer point of perspective I like the idea of namespaces within the mxml file. If I want a button using the default namespaces I type [But and use code hinting to select which version (the fact that you need to press code hinting twice to get the old one is discussed here: http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-19530). With prefixes I would have to know which versions were available, as the components are prefixed with it. Now I only need to know I want a button and choose it’s version after I found the button.
You might argue that fx and mx are not clear in a sense of versions, but you can set the namespace yourself, changing it to v1, v2, etc.
Greetz Erik

Comment on Prefixes vs. Namespaces… Conclusion by Burak KALAYCI

Burak KALAYCI — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:31:52 +0000

Hi Ryan,
At least, you seem to acknowledge there is a problem. That’s something!
Best,
Burak

Comment on Prefixes vs. Namespaces… Conclusion by ryan miller

ryan miller — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:43:15 +0000

wow, that’s a really simple elegant solution to the problem! actually wait, no it’s not!

Comment on Prefixes vs. Namespaces… Why would the prefix solution have scaled better? by Jared

Jared — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:29:51 +0000

[1] is not true. Consider using one component set for Mobile, Internet and a set-top box etc. With Prefix you have to change every line of code, Namespaces 1 per file.
Also when a component set is depricated, gone, finished you delete it’s directories and it is no more its impact is no longer present on the framework.
Components that are going to change should never have been never have been inclueded in the same namespace as language elements in the 1st place.
Packages and Namespaces are part of every Flex project and if not you are doing it wrong or creating trivial appss. Why should efforts be made to hide the concept from new users? It is a matter of hours for a new developer to be exposed to the concept why not have it their from the start.
Kittens die everytime you post promoting Prefixes.